SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025
Digital competence for sustainable education of pre-service teachers: a systematic literature review (2014-2024).
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Developing and validating a digital literacy assessment framework for pre-service physical education teachers: a Delphi-AHP study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rapid advancement of educational digitalization, pre-service teachers' digital competence has become a critical prerequisite for adapting to modern teaching practices and promoting high-quality education. This systematic review provides a comprehensive analysis of research on the digital competence of pre-service teachers over the past decade (2014-2024). Drawing on 38 studies retrieved from the Web of Science and Scopus databases, it examines several key aspects, including publication trends, frameworks, research themes and achievements, research methods, and current research limitations. Findings indicate a steady increase in scholarly publications on pre-service teachers' digital competence over this period, reflecting the growing importance of digital literacy for effective teaching in modern classrooms. Among the frameworks employed, the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework emerges as the most widely adopted, helping researchers understand how technology can be effectively integrated into teaching practices. A notable trend is the integration of such frameworks, which enriches conceptual foundations and broadens practical applications. In addition, pre-service teachers generally demonstrate adequate digital skills for daily tasks, but show uneven performance across competence dimensions, with particular weaknesses in digital content creation, pedagogical integration, and problem-solving. The field has gradually evolved from descriptive analyses of competence levels toward more application-oriented inquiries, highlighting training design, assessment development, and technology integration. Review analysis reveals that pre-service teachers' digital competence is influenced by a combination of demographic, psychological, educational, and socio-cultural factors. Several key limitations have been identified, including insufficient sample representativeness, less rigorous research designs, interference from background factors etc., underscoring the need for more robust research designs, diverse assessment instruments, and larger, more representative samples to strengthen the evidence base. The findings also reveal gaps in complex technical operations and teaching applications, as well as in training programs related to technology integration and innovation. By providing a comprehensive synthesis of existing literature, this review offers valuable insights for educators, policymakers, and researchers aiming to foster the digital readiness of future teachers. Future research should address these limitations by employing larger and more diverse samples, integrating mixed-methods designs, including multilingual and qualitative studies, and exploring digital competence in specific subjects or grade levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.