ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Voice in the algorithmic era: how perceived algorithmic control influences gig workers' voice behavior.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Responsible workplace data governance and organizational performance: evidence from Chinese listed firms.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Existing studies have focused on gig workers' voice behavior and the mechanisms through which it is expressed via official and unofficial channels, the underlying logic of voice behavior generation, particularly its operational pathways under algorithmic control remains under-investigated. Drawing on fairness heuristic theory, this paper proposes a moderated mediation model to explore the effect of perceived algorithmic control on gig workers' voice behavior and its boundary condition. Based on the questionnaire data of 260 gig workers, the empirical results indicate that perceived algorithmic control significantly and positively predicts gig workers' voice behavior by enhancing their perception of algorithmic fairness. Furthermore, voice endorsement moderates the relationship between perception of algorithmic fairness and voice behavior. Complementing these findings, in-depth interviews with 22 gig workers provide a more nuanced understanding of how individuals construct fairness perceptions under algorithmic control and how these perceptions inform their decisions to engage in voice behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.