ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
The Super Spreadsheet: collaborative information infrastructure in translational teams.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Science teams rely on multiple types of information to communicate, coordinate, and collaborate on their research and operational endeavors. While the Science of Team Science (SciTS) offers robust literature on how such teams use and manage their data, we know relatively little about their collective information behaviors. This paper, the first in a series, reports findings from the Information Management Prototype for Clinical and Translational Research (IMPACT-CTR) study, which examines collaborative information infrastructure within one type of science team: clinical and translational research teams (CTRTs). Methods: We interviewed 48 team members across 10 U.S.-based teams. Results: Analyses revealed that CTRTs progress through the research lifecycle of their collaborations by maneuvering several types of information dispersed across various tools, while simultaneously managing their individual information organizational styles in relation to those of their team members. Unlike data, the role of information in their work was often overlooked or undervalued. Teams with misaligned information management experienced time lags and slower project progress, whereas alignment fostered fluency in their work. Discussion: By generating a typology of information and identifying tensions between individual and collective information practices, this study facilitates our understanding of how to support rigorous and reproducible team science practices in CTRTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.