Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41602653›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

A Turkish translation and validation of the Sense of Agency Scale (SoAS-TR).

Işık Batuhan Çakmak, Şeyma Uygun, İrem Kar, Erol Göka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Işık Batuhan ÇakmakDepartment of Psychiatry, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Türkiye.
Şeyma UygunDepartment of Psychiatry, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Türkiye.
İrem KarDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Erol GökaDepartment of Psychiatry, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sense of agency is defined as the experience of being the initiator of one's actions and of influencing one's surroundings. It represents a fundamental aspect of action monitoring, self-recognition, and the ability to distinguish one's own actions from external events. Disturbances in the sense of agency have been reported across various psychiatric conditions, underscoring the need for valid self-report tools. However, no validated measure has been available to assess general agency beliefs in Turkish. This study aimed to adapt the Sense of Agency Scale into Turkish and evaluate its psychometric properties in an adult community sample. A total of 316 participants (65.5% women; mean age = 36.0, SD = 12.2) completed the survey, and 85 completed a 2-week retest. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the original two-factor structure-Sense of Positive Agency and Sense of Negative Agency-demonstrating good model fit, strong internal consistency, and moderate test-retest reliability. Construct validity was supported through associations with relevant constructs measured by the General Self-Efficacy Scale, the Rotter Internal-External Locus of Control Scale, the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, and the Free Will and Determinism Scale. Incremental validity analyses showed that the sense of negative agency explained significant additional variance in depressive symptoms, obsessive-compulsive traits, and schizotypal personality features beyond self-efficacy and locus of control, as assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory, the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised, and the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire, respectively. Associations with the Religiosity Scale were also examined to explore cultural dimensions of agency beliefs. Overall, the findings indicate that the Turkish adaptation is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing general agency beliefs across clinical and non-clinical contexts.

Indexed as

general agency beliefsjudgment of agencyquestionnaire validationself-agencySense of Agency (SoA)test–retest reliabilityTurkish translation

Identifiers

PMID41602653
PMCPMC12832476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.