Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41602632›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Reducing anxiety and enhancing performance: the impact of AI chatbots versus human facilitation on EFL speaking assessment outcomes.

Zafer Susoy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Zafer SusoyDepartment of English Language Teaching, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study investigates the comparative impact of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots and human facilitation on foreign language speaking anxiety and achievement scores among 48 first-year English Language Teaching students at a Turkish public university. Methods: Using a mixed-methods approach, we administered two comparable speaking examinations-one facilitated by an AI chatbot and the other by human instructors-with Foreign Language Speaking Anxiety Scale assessments preceding each exam. Additionally, students completed a digital literacy assessment to determine technological proficiency levels. Semi-structured interviews provided qualitative insights into student experiences. Results: Results revealed a significant negative correlation between speaking anxiety and achievement scores in human-facilitated examinations ( Discussion: The findings contribute to the theoretical understanding of technology-mediated assessment in foreign language education and offer practical implications for creating anxiety-reduced assessment environments. Notably, this study extends current research by addressing cross-cultural considerations in AI assessment implementation and examining how technological familiarity influences assessment experiences across diverse educational contexts.

Indexed as

AI chatbotsdigital literacyforeign language speaking anxietymixed-methods researchspeaking assessmenttechnology-enhanced language learning

Identifiers

PMID41602632
PMCPMC12832806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.