ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Clinical features and computed tomography findings of retrobulbar disease in cats.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to describe the clinical features and computed tomography (CT) findings of cats affected with retrobulbar disease. The medical records of 37 client-owned cats diagnosed with retrobulbar disease between the years 2009-2024 were reviewed. Clinical information, signalment, the presenting specialty service, clinical signs, diagnostic results, treatment, and outcomes were documented. CT features of retrobulbar disease as well as cytology and histopathology were reviewed. Fifteen cats (40.5%) were diagnosed with primary disease in the retrobulbar space and 22 cats (59.5%) were diagnosed with secondary retrobulbar disease. Out of the 15 cats with primary retrobulbar disease, 9 were diagnosed with neoplasia, 3 were diagnosed with an infectious/inflammatory process, 2 were traumatic in origin, and 1 cat had a cyst. Of the 22 cats with secondary retrobulbar disease, 21 cats were diagnosed with neoplasia and 1 cat was diagnosed with an infectious disease. CT findings of orbital osteolysis and reduction of retrobulbar fat were significantly associated with neoplasia. Survival outcomes for cats diagnosed with a primary retrobulbar infectious/inflammatory disease were significantly better than for those diagnosed with primary or secondary retrobulbar neoplasia. This study found that neoplasia is the most common primary and secondary retrobulbar disease in cats. Due to the significantly different prognostic implications between cats with primary infectious/inflammatory retrobulbar disease, primary neoplasia and secondary neoplasia, we also confirmed that CT is an essential part of diagnosis and characterization of the extent of the disease, and that additional diagnostics such as histopathology, cytology, culture and susceptibility, or fungal cultures are needed to further support and guide treatment options. Finally, cats that present with either primary infectious/inflammatory or traumatic retrobulbar disease carry favorable prognosis with either medical or surgical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.