Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41602618›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Making sense of expanding transcriptomic data: network-based approaches for studying reproduction in domestic and wild animal species.

Olga Amelkina, Pierre Comizzoli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Olga AmelkinaDepartment of Reproduction Biology, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.
Pierre ComizzoliSmithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, DC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcriptomic datasets in animal reproductive biology are expanding rapidly, creating more opportunities to explore genome-phenome relationships, uncover biological mechanisms, and improve assisted reproductive technologies. This mini-review emphasizes the shift from single-gene analyses to a systems biology approach, where genes and pathways are studied within networks to capture their interactions and better understand biological systems. We show how network visualization can help synthesize knowledge from complex RNA-seq outputs and provide examples of tools and workflows suitable for species with different levels of data availability and annotation. Best practices for data generation and integration from various databases are discussed, highlighting the importance of high quality well-annotated datasets, transparent reporting, and the pitfalls of overinterpretation. Machine learning methods are explored as an analysis option for experiments with hundreds of data points. Ultimately, expanding available expression datasets for non-model species, combined with rigorous data processing and interpretation, will enable reproductive biologists to integrate network-based strategies into their research and advance reproductive science as well as conservation programs.

Indexed as

machine learningnetwork visualizationnon-model animal speciespathway enrichmentreproductiontranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID41602618
PMCPMC12832437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.