ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Interventional pain management in dogs with lumbosacral stenosis: preliminary long-term clinical outcomes of combined foraminal and epidural injections with or without pulsed radiofrequency.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound-guided cranial multifidus cervicis plane block in dogs: a cadaveric study.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Lateral full-endoscopic lumbosacral foraminotomy for foraminal stenosis in dogs: technique development and initial case series.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Lumbosacral stenosis is a recognised cause of pain in dogs, often involving disc herniation and foraminal narrowing with associated radiculopathy. In humans, transforaminal injections demonstrate superior outcomes to interlaminar approaches and are frequently combined with pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) at the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) to enhance pain relief. However, their clinical utility in dogs with naturally occurring lumbosacral pain remains unreported. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated long-term outcomes (capped at 24 months) following a single procedure involving ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided foraminal and epidural corticosteroid and local anaesthetic injections, with (PRF; 9 dogs) or without PRF (No-PRF; 9 dogs) at the L7 DRG, in dogs with chronic lumbosacral pain. Outcome measures included clinician-based Lumbosacral Pain (LSPain) Scale scores and caregiver-reported Canine Brief Pain Inventory (CBPI) scores and quality of life (QoL). Clinically relevant improvement was defined as a two-grade reduction in LSPain Scale score and a CBPI decrease of ≥1 point in pain severity and ≥2 points in pain interference. Data were analysed using Fisher's Exact Test, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and generalised linear mixed models in R. Results: Baseline outcomes did not differ significantly between groups. Pain severity and QoL improved significantly over time within both groups ( Discussion: These preliminary findings suggest that image-guided targeted injections, with or without adjunctive PRF, may provide long-term pain alleviation in dogs with lumbosacral stenosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.