SynthesisFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Foot and mouth disease biosecurity and risk mitigation in auction markets: a scoping review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Foot and mouth disease (FMD) is a highly contagious, viral vesicular disease affecting cloven-hoofed livestock species. The disease has negative impacts on livestock health and wellbeing as well as international trade opportunities for affected countries. The United States (U. S.), while currently free from FMD, has developed preparedness and response resources, including biosecurity guidance, for many livestock industry sectors with the aim of balancing robust disease control with business continuity. However, guidance on effective biosecurity strategies for auction markets is lacking. Methods: Therefore, the objective of this scoping review is to identify peer-reviewed literature that describes biosecurity strategies which decrease the risk of FMD introduction into auction markets or mitigation strategies that prevent FMD transmission from auction markets. Results: Eight reports were included in this review with six reports discussing FMD biosecurity risks from auction markets, and two reports discussing FMD outbreak mitigation strategies involving auction markets. No reports describing FMD biosecurity risks to or strategies for auction markets were identified for inclusion in this review. Discussion: This review demonstrates the association between livestock movement through auction markets and FMD introduction risk to herds as well as the potential for auction markets to contribute to widespread dissemination of FMD in the absence of biosecurity strategies. Developing resources to address this current preparedness gap is a critical need illustrated by the evidence identified in this review. Effective biosecurity strategies and risk mitigation guidance for auction markets would substantially bolster the U. S. livestock industry's resiliency in the event of an FMD incursion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.