ArticleFrontiers in dental medicine2025
Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of a novel composite bone substitute synthesized from eggshell-derived hydroxyapatite and fish collagen in bone regeneration of critical-sized calvarial defects in Wistar rats.
Article in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Large bone deformities pose significant challenges in regenerative periodontal surgeries. A healthy underlying bone and the osteoinductive effect of the surrounding environment are the primary factors that influence bone regeneration. Collagen and hydroxyapatite are universally used bone substitutes owing to their excellent biocompatibility and biodegradability. Innovations in the osteoinductive properties of hydroxyapatite and its use in different modified forms, combining it with other materials, may result in enhanced biomechanical properties. This research utilized domestic chicken eggshells to synthesize hydroxyapatite and fish scales to extract collagen. The novel composite graft was prepared by integrating both materials. The beneficial effects of the composite graft on the healing and regeneration of bone were assessed in the calvarial bone of Wistar rats both radiographically and histomorphometrically. Methods: Hydroxyapatite was synthesized from domestic chicken eggshells using the chemical precipitation method. Collagen was extracted from the scales of Rohu fish. The novel composite material was prepared by direct mixing and lyophilization, with further mixing with glycerol to attain an appropriate consistency. After preliminary characterization, bone regeneration was assessed in surgically created critical bone defects in rats. Radiographic bone fill was assessed using cone beam computed tomography, which was followed by histomorphometry. The bone regenerative capacities of the two novel materials were compared with empty control sites and a commercially available standard bone graft (Bio-Oss). Results: The novel materials displayed significantly superior regenerative capacity both radiographically and histomorphometrically when compared to empty controls, but the regenerative ability was lower when compared to the standard bone graft material (Bio-Oss) over 90 days. A trend of increased new bone formation and significantly higher radiodensity was observed in the sites treated with the composite graft compared to the empty control ( Conclusion: The composite graft demonstrated improved bone regeneration and radiodensity in the surgically created critical-sized defects. Hence, it can be considered a promising material for the regeneration of periodontal and peri-implant defects. Further laboratory and clinical studies may be required to confirm its osteoinductive properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.