ArticleInnovation in aging2026
The role of living arrangements in disability assistance and survival in Mexican older adults.
Article in Innovation in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Objectives: This study estimates life expectancy with basic activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental ADL (IADL) limitations by living arrangements at age 60 for Mexican adults, using the Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS) data from 2012 to 2021. We extend previous research by examining assistance with ADL and IADL as a measure of disability severity and exploring the association of disability assistance and mortality. Research Design and Methods: Generalized estimating equations were used to examine the relationship between receiving help and living arrangements (living alone, with spouse only, or in extended households). Cox proportional hazards regression assessed the effect of receiving help on mortality. Multistate life table models were used to estimate life expectancy with and without help for ADL and IADL limitations, by gender and living arrangements. Results: At age 60, those living alone spent a larger share of post-disability life without receiving assistance (ADL: 68.1%; IADL: 19.9%) than those living with others (ADL: 61.6%; IADL: 15.8%). Compared with co-residers, older adults living alone had higher odds of not receiving help with ADL and IADL. Individuals receiving help had higher mortality (ADL hazard ratio [HR] = 1.57; IADL HR = 1.62), consistent with help being a marker of greater severity, not a causal effect. Discussion and Implications: Extended households enable individuals with disabilities to receive assistance for a longer period. Disability assistance was associated with increased mortality risk, highlighting its role as an indirect measure of disability severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.