ReviewJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2026
Risk factors for acromial and scapular fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of over 100,000 shoulders.
Review in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes of operative and non-operative management of acromial and scapular spine fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2026Review
- Risk factors for acromion and scapular spine fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a time-to-event analysis.Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2026Article
- [Periprosthetic glenoid and acromial fractures after primary shoulder arthroplasty : Diagnosis, treatment, and revision strategies].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Risk factors for acromial stress fractures following primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the impact of prior acromioplasty and radiographic parameters.Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2026Article
- Ultrasonographic Diagnosis and Computed Tomographic Confirmation of a Scapular Body Stress Fracture in an Elite Boxer: A Case Report.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stress acromial fractures (AF) and scapular spine fractures (SSF) are rare but challenging complications of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). The purpose of our study was to identify risk factors of AF and SSF after rTSA through a detailed systematic review of published literature. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to October 2023. We included all peer-reviewed studies investigating the risk of AF and SSF after rTSA, excluding biomechanical studies. A total of 1,047 publications were reviewed, and 25 publications with a total of 100,205 shoulders met our inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of these publications was conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were used to estimate risks for categorical variables (gender, osteoporosis, inflammatory arthritis, and surgical history). Mean differences (MD) and standard deviations were used to determine the effect of continuous variables, such as age and body mass index (BMI). Results: The pooled reported rate of AF and SSF was 2%. Our analyses identified a higher risk of AF and SSF in patients with osteoporosis (OR = 2.33, Conclusion: Patients who suffered AF or SSF after rTSA were older with lower BMI. Other risk factors identified included osteoporosis, inflammatory arthritis, female gender, and previous rotator cuff repair. There is, however, a need for further investigations into additional crucial factors, such as prosthesis type and design and lateralization of components, as these variables could significantly influence complication rates and patient outcomes following rTSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.