ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2026
Investments in health and mortality reduction to address population decline.
Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multisectoral policy and health systems responses to ageing populations.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2026Article
- Investments in health and mortality reduction to address population decline.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Faced with significant population decline, many governments have turned to pronatalist policies to boost birth rates, even though such approaches are frequently ineffective and potentially infringe on reproductive rights. This study demonstrates that a more effective and immediate policy alternative exists: reducing preventable and treatable mortality. Using United Nations data, we modelled population projections to 2050 in 28 countries and territories, comparing a baseline scenario against two benchmarks: an immediate increase to replacement-level fertility and the reduction of national mortality rates to match the rate of Japan. Our findings show that investing in health is a more effective way to reduce population decline than raising fertility, particularly for countries in eastern and south-eastern Europe. For countries in the World Health Organization European Region that are most affected by population decline, achieving Japanese mortality levels would almost halve population loss, greatly outperforming the reduced decline expected with a replacement fertility approach. We consider that reducing mortality should be a central pillar of a demographic strategy. This approach offers faster demographic returns, aligns with human rights and healthy ageing goals, and provides a stronger return on prior societal investments in education and health. We recommend that policy-makers therefore move towards strengthening health systems, disease prevention and public health interventions. At the same time, they should integrate these measures with broader institutional reforms for a more sustainable response to population change that protects human rights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.