ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Kinematic and kinetic characteristics exhibit differences in two typical progressive movements of Baduangong and Tai Chi: a comparison based on personalized musculoskeletal simulation analysis.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to analyze the lower limb kinematic and kinetic characteristics of these two Qigong progressive movements, laying a preliminary biomechanical foundation for exploring their potential applications in targeted movement-based interventions. Methods: A total of 21 non-athletic healthy students were recruited, all of whom had completed Qigong course training. Motion capture equipment was used to collect motion data and ground reaction force data of each participant, including data for 8th movement of Baduangong (BDG (8th)), warding off in advancing of Tai Chi (TC (WOA)), and normal walking gait (NG (Walk)). The AnyBody Modeling System was used for personalization to construct a musculoskeletal model based on the participants' body weight and fat percentage. Kinematic and inverse dynamics analyses were conducted to obtain lower limb joint range of motion (ROM), joint reaction forces, and moments. Results: Two progressive movements had similar gait cycles (9-10 s), longer than NG (Walk) (1.15 ± 0.04 s, p < 0.01), with larger joint ROM (especially hip/knee flexion-extension). Their lower limb joint forces, moments were higher than NG (Walk) (p < 0.05); Comparing the two progressive movements, TC (WOA) exhibited higher peak joint reaction forces (p < 0.05); while BDG (8th) demonstrated greater peak hip abduction and extension moments (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The two progressive movements share the Qigong characteristic of "slowness and continuity", but they exhibit different biomechanical features due to different movement design concepts. BDG (8th) is characterized by "fast rhythm, long stride length, and flexible transformation", and exhibits high hip abduction moments. TC(WOA) is characterized by "slow rhythm, short stride length, and phased regulation" and shows kinematic features associated with multi-directional joint movement control. These findings lay a preliminary biomechanical foundation for exploring the potential differentiated applications of the two Qigong movements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.