ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Inclusive and sustainable active mobility: recommendations for older adults in Montenegro.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper provides a perspective on inclusive and sustainable active mobility solutions for older adults in Montenegro, informed by research conducted in Podgorica and the wider region. Active mobility is a key factor influencing healthy ageing, social inclusion, and quality of life; however, its improvement requires a systemic approach connecting urban planning, public health, and social policy. In Montenegro, rapid urbanization, insufficient infrastructure, and limited intersectoral cooperation challenge the development of safe and accessible mobility options for older citizens. Using an analytical framework developed within two COST Actions and guided by the WHO "Age-friendly Cities" model, this perspective proposes recommendations aimed at improving accessibility, safety, and participation of older adults in public space. Special emphasis is placed on integrating GIS tools into local planning, introducing regular accessibility assessments, and involving older residents in decision-making processes. This perspective argues that inclusive and sustainable active mobility is not only an infrastructural requirement but also a public health priority that demands long-term, coordinated strategies aligned with European standards. It thereby contributes to advancing policy and planning efforts toward age-friendly urban development in emerging European contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.