Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41602433›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Development and validation of an LDCT-based deep learning radiomics nomogram for predicting postoperative recurrence of stage Ia lung adenocarcinoma.

Haimei Lan, Chaosheng Wei, Yiming Luo, Mingzhuang Liao, Hongfeng Liang, Jianli Qin, Jixing Yi, Fengming Xu, Dandan Huang, Meiqing Zhang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Haimei LanDepartment of Radiology, Liuzhou Workers' Hospital, Guangxi, China.
Chaosheng WeiDepartment of Radiology, Liuzhou Workers' Hospital, Guangxi, China.
Yiming LuoDepartment of Radiation Therapy, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Guangxi, China.
Mingzhuang LiaoDepartment of Radiology, Liuzhou Workers' Hospital, Guangxi, China.
Hongfeng LiangDepartment of Radiology, Liuzhou Workers' Hospital, Guangxi, China.
Jianli QinDepartment of Radiology, Liuzhou Workers' Hospital, Guangxi, China.
Jixing YiDepartment of Radiology, Liuzhou Workers' Hospital, Guangxi, China.
Fengming XuDepartment of Radiology, Liuzhou Workers' Hospital, Guangxi, China.
Dandan HuangDepartment of Radiology, Liuzhou Workers' Hospital, Guangxi, China.
Meiqing ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Liuzhou Workers' Hospital, Guangxi, China.
Qing FengDepartment of Radiology, Liuzhou Workers' Hospital, Guangxi, China.
Tao LiDepartment of Radiology, Liuzhou Workers' Hospital, Guangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study wanted to use low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) plain scan images to create a deep learning radiomic nomogram (DLRN) to accurately predict the likelihood of recurrence after surgery in patients with stage Ia lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Methods: We collected cases from January 2010 to December 2020 at Center 1 who underwent surgery and were pathologically diagnosed with stage Ia LUAD, and additionally collected patients with the same criteria at Center 2 from January 2015 to December 2018 for external validation. Deep learning and radiomic feature extraction were performed on LDCT images of all patients. In the deep learning and radiomics methods, we tested multiple different models and selected the best model based on the results of the internal validation cohort. Finally, we construct a nomogram by combining deep learning features, radiomics features and clinical data. Subsequently, We used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to check how well these models performed in terms of diagnosis. The calibration degree of each model was evaluated using calibration curves, while the clinical value of each model was assessed through decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: In Center 1, we collected a total of 233 eligible patients, who were randomly divided into a training cohort (163 patients) and an internal validation cohort (70 patients) at a 7:3 ratio. And we collected included a total of 89 patients in Center 2. Internal validation results showed Resnet50 and Logistic Regression (LR) as optimal models for deep learning and radiomics approaches, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) values for this combined model were 0.972 (95% CI: 0.949-0.995) in the training cohort, 0.925 (95% CI: 0.845-1.000) in the internal validation cohort, and 0.915 (95% CI: 0.853-0.976) in the external validation cohort. Compared with other single models, it demonstrated the best performance. Conclusion: Preoperative DLRN based on LDCT plain scan images exhibit good predictive value for postoperative recurrence in patients with stage Ia LUAD. The present study developed a novel prognostic assessment method with the objective of assisting clinicians in refining adjuvant treatment plans for patients with stage Ia LUAD, thus facilitating personalised prognostic management.

Indexed as

deep leraning radiomics nomogramlow-dose computed tomographylung adenocarcinomapredictive modelResNet50

Identifiers

PMID41602433
PMCPMC12832404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.