Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41602407›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Prognostic value of LDH and α-HBDH dynamic levels for 1-year overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer treated with chemoimmunotherapy.

Wanjing Li, Guochang Du, Shuangqing Lu, Hui Zhu, Ke Zhao, Jinming Yu, Yanqin Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wanjing Li *Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong University Cancer Center, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Guochang Du *Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Shuangqing LuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Hui ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Ke ZhaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Jinming YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong University Cancer Center, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Yanqin YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) remains a lethal malignancy with limited prognostic biomarkers. This study evaluated the prognostic utility of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and α-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase (α-HBDH) levels at baseline and after 2 cycles of treatment in ES-SCLC patients receiving first-line chemoimmunotherapy. Methods: Continuous variables were converted into categorical ones based on optimal cutoffs identified by ROC curve analysis (maximizing Youden's index). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated via the Kaplan-Meier method and compared via the log-rank test. In addition, the Cox regression model was used to analyze prognostic factors. Associations between LDH and α-HBDH levels and clinical parameters (T/N stage, age, and immune-related toxicity) were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test and binary logistic regression. Results: A cohort of 201 ES-SCLC patients treated with chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors was analyzed retrospectively. Elevated baseline serum LDH >245 U/L and α-HBDH >182 U/L levels predicted poor OS (p = 0.046, HR = 1.798, 95% CI: 1.020-3.167; p = 0.007, HR = 2.268, 95% CI: 1.288-3.994); inadequate 2-cycle reductions (ΔLDH ≤ 108.5U/L; Δα-HBDH ≤ 62.5U/L) further predicted poor OS (p<0.001, HR = 2.561, 95% CI: 1.291-5.080; p<0.001, HR = 2.807, 95% CI: 1.457-5.411). For progression-free survival, no significant difference was observed between patients with elevated baseline serum LDH >245 U/L or α-HBDH >182 U/L and those with normal levels; similarly, there was no significant difference between patients with an on-treatment increase (ΔLDH>12.5 U/L or Δα-HBDH>0.5 U/L from baseline) and those with a lesser increase or decrease. (P = 0.768, HR = 1.055, 95% CI: 0.739-1.507 for baseline LDH; P = 0.529, HR = 1.121, 95% CI: 0.785-1.601 for baseline α-HBDH; P = 0.115, HR = 0.719, 95% CI: 0.457-1.131 for ΔLDH; P = 0.094, HR = 0.730, 95% CI: 0.494-1.080 for Δα-HBDH). Advanced T4/N3 stage and age ≥65 years significantly modulated biomarker trajectories (p<0.05). Conclusion: LDH and α-HBDH serve as key prognostic biomarkers in ES-SCLC patients undergoing first-line chemoimmunotherapy. We established clinically validated thresholds, which can guide treatment by identifying patients with elevated or insufficiently declining levels as high-risk, thereby supporting early and targeted therapeutic intervention.

Indexed as

chemoimmunotherapyextensive-stage small cell lung cancerlactate dehydrogenaseprognostic biomarkersα-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID41602407
PMCPMC12833455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.