ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Integrated surgical treatment: a new model for treating secondary extremity lymphedema based on algorithms.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06920732 (Comparative Efficacy of 3L and 2L Integrated Techniques for Gynecologic Cancer-related Lower Extremity Lymphedema), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparative Efficacy of 3L and 2L Integrated Techniques for Gynecologic Cancer-related Lower Extremity Lymphedema: a Retrospective Study
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cutaneous fibrosis disease: from mechanisms to therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Immune cell fibrotic plasticity: mesenchymal-like reprogramming of macrophages, neutrophils and T cells.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Secondary extremity lymphedema (SEL) is a chronic and progressive disorder resulting from impaired lymphatic drainage, most commonly following oncologic interventions such as breast or gynecological cancer surgery. Characterized by the accumulation of lymphatic fluid, progressive inflammation, adipose hypertrophy, and tissue fibrosis, SEL poses significant therapeutic challenges, particularly in its advanced stages. While conservative management remains the first-line treatment for mild cases, surgical intervention becomes essential in moderate to severe disease. Surgical approaches are generally categorized into physiological procedures, which aim to restore lymphatic continuity (e.g., lymphaticovenous anastomosis [LVA], vascularized lymph node transfer [VLNT]), and excisional techniques, which remove fibrotic and adipose tissue (e.g., liposuction, Charles procedure). Increasingly, integrated strategies combining physiological and excisional methods have demonstrated superior outcomes by targeting both fluid and solid components of the disease. However, multiple challenges remain, including the identification of functional lymphatic vessels, donor site morbidity, variability in long-term outcomes, and a lack of standardized surgical algorithms. Emerging evidence supports a component-based, individualized surgical framework tailored to disease severity, pathological tissue composition, and lymphatic functionality. Combined approaches such as the "3L" strategy (LVA, VLNT, and liposuction) have shown promise in enhancing volume reduction, minimizing infection risk, and improving quality of life. This review synthesizes recent advancements in SEL surgery and proposes a practical decision-making algorithm, the ISTL algorithm, which integrates clinical evaluations, imaging diagnostics, and surgical interventions for personalized treatment planning and improved long-term surgical outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration: This study was registered at the China Clinical Trial Registration (www.chictr.org.cn) with the registration number NCT06920732.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.