ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
The molecular classification ushers in a new era for the treatment of advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current status and targeted therapies in endometrial cancer: Molecular classification-driven treatment strategies (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Axillary metastasis in non-specific molecular profile of endometrial carcinoma: a case report and literature review.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Effects of adjuvant propofol on antitumoral effects of carboplatin in experimental endometrial cancer: possible epigenetic associations.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Natural Products in Endometrial Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms, Preclinical Evidence, and Clinical Perspectives.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is among the most common malignant tumors of the female reproductive system, with an increasing incidence globally over the past decade and ranking first among gynecological malignancies in developed countries. Although early-stage prognosis is favorable, the mortality rate of advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer remains high, posing a significant clinical challenge. Molecular classification systems, such as TCGA and ProMisE, have identified four distinct molecular subtypes: POLE-mutant (POLEmut), mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd), no specific molecular profile (NSMP), and p53-abnormal (p53abn), each exhibiting significantly different biological behaviors, recurrence patterns, and treatment responses. "Chemotherapy-free" strategies show potential for specific subtypes and offer new avenues for reducing toxicity. Faced with challenges, such as tumor heterogeneity and drug resistance mechanisms, future research should focus on optimizing standardized molecular classification protocols, exploring novel combination therapies, and integrating real-world evidence. A personalized treatment system centered on molecular classification that considers the quality of life and treatment accessibility is crucial for precision medicine in advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.