ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Case Report: Exploration of pacemaker-specific disease management based on a generalist-specialist collaboration model.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The management of patients with pacemakers in the community is challenged by limited resources and the need for advanced specialty care. Methods: A remote monitoring system for pacemakers was incorporated into a generalist-specialist care model, facilitating seamless collaboration between general practitioners and cardiologists. A case of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy managed through this model was presented in this study. Results: The patient received timely diagnosis and treatment, including an upgrade to a cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker device with remote monitoring capabilities, which significantly improved symptoms and quality of life. Conclusion: Supported by new technologies, the generalist-specialist collaboration model offers an effective approach for managing patients with pacemakers, enhancing continuity of care and optimizing healthcare resource utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.