ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
The efficacy and safety of lower-dose aspirin for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in the elderly: an interim analysis of a multicenter, prospective, observational study.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
42 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Although low-dose aspirin effectively reduces atherothrombosis occurrence in individuals diagnosed with cardiovascular disease (CVD) or in those with high-risk factors, it is significantly associated with increased bleeding. No evidence has been established for a lower dose of aspirin. Methods: The Lower-dose Aspirin for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in the Elderly (LAPIS) is a multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study, which compared the benefits and risks in adults aged 60 years and older taking aspirin 50 or 100 mg/day for primary and secondary CVD prevention in a propensity score-matched population. The efficacy outcome was a composite of the first occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The safety outcome was the first occurrence of any hemorrhagic events. Results: In this interim analysis of LAPIS, 7,021 participants were followed up for a median of 183 (95% CI 169-197) days (primary prevention cohort, 2,070; secondary prevention cohort, 4,951). After adjusting for baseline characteristics using propensity score matching, the MACE incidence did not differ significantly between the two dosage groups in either cohort. However, in the primary prevention cohort, the incidence of any bleeding [8.89 vs. 3.45 events/100 patient-years, hazard ratio (HR) 2.917, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.719-4.952, Conclusion: Aspirin 50 mg/day was associated with lower hemorrhage and gastrointestinal adverse event risks, with similar cardiovascular benefits, compared with aspirin 100 mg/day, and may be preferred to balance efficacy and safety for older Chinese adults in primary and secondary CVD prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.