ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
RiCoRecA:
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite recent advancements, modern kitchens, at best, have one or more isolated (non-communicating) "smart" devices. The vision of having a fully-fledged ambient kitchen where devices know what to do and when has yet to be realized. To address this, we present RiCoRecA, a novel schema for parsing cooking recipes into a workflow representation suitable for automation, a step toward that direction. Methodologically, the schema requires a number of information extraction tasks, i.e., annotating named entities, identifying relations between them, coreference resolution, and entity tracking. RiCoRecA differs from previously reported approaches in that it learns these different information extraction tasks using one joint model. We also provide a dataset containing annotations that follow this schema. Furthermore, we compared two transformer-based models for parsing recipes into workflows, namely, PEGASUS-X and LongT5. Our results demonstrate that PEGASUS-X surpassed LongT5 on all of the annotation tasks. Specifically, PEGASUS-X surpassed LongT5 by 39% in terms of F-Score when averaging the performance on all the tasks; it demonstrated almost human-like performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.