Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41602301›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

Enhanced multi-class object detector for bone fracture diagnosis with prescription recommendation.

Daudi Mashauri Migayo, Shubi Kaijage, Stephen Swetala, Devotha G Nyambo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daudi Mashauri MigayoSchool of Computational and Communication Science and Engineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, Tanzania.
Shubi KaijageSchool of Computational and Communication Science and Engineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, Tanzania.
Stephen SwetalaDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Bugando Medical Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Devotha G NyamboSchool of Computational and Communication Science and Engineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, Tanzania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone fractures are among the most prominent injuries in the modern world that affect all ages and races. Traditional treatment involves radiographic imaging that relies heavily on radiologists manually analyzing images. There have been efforts to develop computer-aided diagnosis tools that employ artificial intelligence and deep learning approaches. Existing literature focuses on developing tools that only detect and classify bone fractures, rather than addressing the broader issue of bone fracture management. However, evidence of scholarly works that include treatment recommendations is still lacking. Furthermore, deep learning-based object detectors that achieve state-of-the-art results are computationally expensive and considered as black-box solutions. Developing countries, such as Sub-Saharan Africa, face a shortage of radiologists and orthopedists. For this reason, this paper proposes a methodological approach that uses a more efficient object detection model to diagnose long bone fractures and provide prescription recommendations. An enhanced anchoring process, known as adaptive anchoring, is proposed to improve the performance of the Regional Proposal Network and the object detection model. A Faster R-CNN model with ResNet-50/101 and ResNext-50/101 backbones was used to develop an object detection model that uses X-ray images as input. To understand and interpret the model's decision, a Gradient-based Class Activation Mapping method was used to assess the model's learnability. The results indicate that the proposed adaptive anchoring approach can improve computational efficiency, reducing training time by up to 29% compared to the traditional approach. Model accuracy during training and validation ranged between 94% and 98%. Overall, adaptive anchoring performed better when applied with the ResNet-101 backbone, yielding an Average Precision of 92.73%, an F1 score of 96.01%, a precision of 96.80%, and a recall of 95.23%. The study provides valuable insights into the use of computationally efficient deep learning models for medical recommendation systems. Future studies should develop models to diagnose fractures using input images from various modalities and to provide prescription recommendations.

Indexed as

adaptive anchoringbone fractureobject detectionprescriptionTanzania

Identifiers

PMID41602301
PMCPMC12833394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.