ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
Health state prediction with reinforcement learning for predictive maintenance.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Predictive maintenance has emerged as a critical strategy in modern manufacturing, in the frame of Industry 4.0, enabling proactive intervention before equipment failure. However, traditional machine learning approaches require extensive labeled data and lack adaptability to evolving operational conditions. On the other hand, Reinforcement Learning (RL) enables agents to learn optimal policies through interaction with the environment, eliminating the need for labeled datasets and naturally capturing the sequential, uncertain dynamics of equipment degradation. Methods: In this paper, we propose an approach that incorporates four model-free RL algorithms, namely Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), Advantage Actor-Critic (A2C), Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG), and Soft Actor-Critic (SAC). We formulate the problem as a Markov Decision Process (MDP), which is solved with the aforementioned RL algorithms. Results: The proposed approach is validated in the context of CNC machine tool wear prediction, using sensor data from the 2010 PHM Society Data Challenge. We examine algorithmic performance across four custom made environments, corrective and non-corrective environments both with and without delay correction mechanisms in order to compare learning dynamics, convergence behavior, and generalization aspects. Our results reveal that PPO and SAC achieve the most stable and efficient performance, with SAC excelling in structured environments and PPO demonstrating robust generalization. A2C shows consistent long-term learning, while DDPG underperforms due to insufficient exploration. Discussion: The findings highlight the potential of RL for predictive maintenance applications and underscore the importance of aligning algorithm design with environment characteristics and reward structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.