Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41602257›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Factors Influencing the Use of Patient-Specific Instrumentation (PSI) in Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Single-Centre Study.

Srikiran Thalanki, Adam Daneshyar, Anurag Dixit, Omar Mostafa, Adrian William Simons, Tim McBride

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Srikiran ThalankiTrauma and Orthopaedics, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, GBR.
Adam DaneshyarTrauma and Orthopaedics, Russells Hall Hospital, Birmingham, GBR.
Anurag DixitTrauma and Orthopaedics, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, GBR.
Omar MostafaTrauma and Orthopaedics, Birmingham Orthopaedic Training Programme, Birmingham, GBR.
Adrian William SimonsTrauma and Orthopaedics, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, GBR.
Tim McBrideTrauma and Orthopaedics, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Accurate component placement is vital for shoulder arthroplasty success, with poor positioning linked to a range of clinical complications. This study aims to identify which patient, anatomical and surgical factors influenced the adoption of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for glenoid component placement. These included patient demographics, implant type, glenoid version and inclination, glenoid dimensions, use of augmentation, and surgeon-related factors. Methodology A retrospective decision-analysis study of 191 shoulder arthroplasty cases (reverse and anatomical) conducted between 2021 and 2024 at a single NHS trust. Preoperative imaging protocols, component planning, degree of deformity and intraoperative decision-making were examined. The primary outcome was the association between anatomical factors and PSI use. Statistical analysis performed using SPSS v16 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Results PSI use was strongly associated with increased glenoid retroversion (Cramér's V = 0.37,

Indexed as

computer assisted instrument guidancecustomized treatment planglenoid morphologyglenoid versionpatient specific implant (psi)pre-operative planningreverse shoulder arthroplastyshoulder arthroplasty/replacement

Identifiers

PMID41602257
PMCPMC12834470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.