ArticleCureus2025
Challenges in Radiotherapy for Mandibular Cancer With Titanium Implant Reconstruction: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nominal material density may not reflect TPS-relevant density for 3D-printed surgical reconstruction implants: An educational case study.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mandibular cancer, a rare and aggressive malignancy, often requires extensive surgical resection followed by complex reconstruction. The advent of 3D-printed titanium implants has revolutionized mandibular reconstruction, offering precise anatomical restoration and improved functional outcomes. However, their integration into the radiotherapy workflow presents unique challenges, particularly in imaging and dose distribution. This case report explores the management of a 71-year-old male with advanced mandibular squamous cell carcinoma, who underwent mandibular reconstruction using a custom 3D-printed titanium implant, followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. The challenges of imaging artifacts and dose perturbations caused by the titanium implant were addressed using advanced techniques, such as volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and manual artifact correction in the treatment planning system (TPS). A multidisciplinary approach, involving surgical, radiological, and radiotherapy teams, was crucial in optimizing treatment while minimizing damage to surrounding healthy tissues. This case underscores the importance of individualized treatment strategies and the need for ongoing research to refine protocols for integrating 3D-printed implants into radiotherapy. Ultimately, the combination of cutting-edge technology and collaborative care enhances patient outcomes and provides a model for managing complex head-and-neck oncology cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.