ArticleCureus2025
Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia for Repeat Ventricular Arrhythmia Catheter Ablation: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Catheter ablation procedures for ventricular arrhythmias are often performed under general anesthesia or total intravenous anesthesia to prevent patient movement and discomfort. However, anesthetic agents such as propofol, opioids, and dexmedetomidine can suppress ventricular arrhythmias, preventing successful mapping and ablation during the procedure. Here, we present the case of a 25-year-old female with premature ventricular contractions (PVC) and ventricular tachycardia (VT) who underwent a successful catheter ablation procedure using regional anesthesia after two previously unsuccessful ablation attempts. The first attempt used total intravenous anesthesia to perform the ablation. However, patient movement complicated the mapping, and ventricular arrhythmias returned in a few weeks. The second procedure used decreased total intravenous sedation to reduce arrhythmia suppression; however, no arrhythmias were able to be induced, and the patient continued to have episodes of ventricular tachycardia. To prevent potential arrhythmia suppression from the prior anesthetic agents used, a different anesthetic approach was used for the third attempt: ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks of the right ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, obturator, and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves. To the authors' current knowledge, there have been no reports in the literature describing regional anesthesia as the primary anesthetic technique specifically to avoid arrhythmia suppression during ventricular arrhythmia catheter ablation procedures. This technique enabled successful arrhythmia inducibility, which in turn allowed for accurate mapping and ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.