Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41602183›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2026

Intravital microscopy for nanomedicine: investigating nanoparticle-tissue interactions in the native state.

Giovanni M Saladino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Endothelial Continuum and Capillary Specialization in Pulmonary Vascular Development.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Giovanni M SaladinoDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University Stanford CA 94305 USA gmsaladino@stanford.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6854-1423

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanomedicine is an evolving field that employs nanoparticles (NPs) for drug delivery systems, molecular imaging, and therapeutic interventions. However, characterizing NP-cell interactions poses significant challenges, mainly due to the limitations of traditional postmortem histological methods, such as immunofluorescence staining. These techniques yield a single time-point analysis and include lengthy preprocessing steps that can induce artifacts and alter tissue architecture. They result in the clearance of blood components, preventing the evaluation of circulating NPs. Moreover, the rapid sequestration of NPs by organs, particularly the liver and spleen, limits the understanding of their biodistribution and pharmacokinetic profiles. In this context, intravital microscopy (IVM) has emerged as a unique imaging technology that allows real-time visualization of NP behavior within living organisms. By maintaining the physiological context, IVM enables the investigation of NP circulation, tissue accumulation, and cellular interactions at the microscopic scale. This review focuses on the recent uses of IVM to investigate NP-cell interactions in nanomedicine, highlighting its impact on advancing knowledge of NP dynamics, uptake, and the development of more targeted NP-based therapies.

Identifiers

PMID41602183
PMCPMC12834011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.