ArticleJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2026
Improved Computed Tomography Imaging Post-Flow Diverter Treatment Using a SOMATOM X.Cite Scanner.
Article in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Treatment with flow diverters requires follow-up imaging. Conventional CT suffers from beam-hardening artifacts caused by the stent, complicating the evaluation. This study introduced the SOMATOM X.cite (Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) scanner to improve imaging quality for stent follow-up and examined its image output (stent condition). Methods: From January 2021 to April 2024, 27 patients treated with flow diverters were imaged using SOMATOM X.cite, conventional CT, and the ARTIS icono D-Spin system (Siemens Healthineers). The aneurysm locations included the internal carotid artery-specifically, 11 cases in the paraclinoid segment and 8 in the cavernous segment, as well as the vertebral artery in 8 patients. The aneurysm sizes were ≥10 mm (14 cases) and 5-10 mm (13 cases). The image quality of the stented parent artery was subjectively scored on a 2-point scale, adapted from a previous report in which a 3-point scale had originally been used, as follows: 1 = moderate (evaluation could be made but information was lacking compared with DSA), and 2 = good (image could be evaluated similarly to DSA). Results: Compared with conventional contrast-enhanced CT, the SOMATOM X.cite significantly reduced beam-hardening artifacts around the stent. In 26 of 27 cases, stent-condition CT images acquired with the SOMATOM X.cite were rated as 2 (good), providing clear visualization of the stent lumen and similar in quality to cone-beam CT. One case had reduced contrast, making aneurysm visualization difficult. In comparison, 27 conventional CT images were rated 1 (moderate). Conclusion: The SOMATOM X.cite scanner provided high-quality imaging comparable to cone-beam CT; thus, it may be a useful tool for follow-up evaluation after flow diverter stenting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.