ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025
Sub-optimal menstrual materials and vaginal microbiome disruption in women relying on sex for livelihood.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The overlooked role of the seminovaginal microbiota in infertility: a narrative mini review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Sub-optimal menstrual materials (MM), such as using cloths, cotton balls, or tissues, can adversely affect the vaginal microbiome (VMB). Women who rely on sex for economic livelihood often use sub-optimal materials to conceal menstruation and avoid loss of income. We hypothesized that among women who rely on sex for economic livelihood, those using sub-optimal MM would be more likely to have non-optimal VMB than those with adequate MM. Methods: This cross-sectional analysis used baseline data from women participating in a trial assessing the impact of reusable menstrual discs on the VMB, Bacterial vaginosis (BV), and sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Data on sociodemographics, menstrual materials, and sexual practices were collected via interviewer-administered survey. Clinician-collected vaginal samples were tested for BV, STI, and VMB. VMB was assessed via 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. A suite of statistical approaches identified factors associated with sub-optimal MM (use of cotton balls, tissue, or cloth) and VMB composition. Results: 407 women were enrolled February through October 2023, with median age 27 years, 24.7% were HIV-positive, 42.2% had BV, and 21.9% had STI (composite of chlamydia, gonorrhea, trichomoniasis). Vaginal community state type (CST) was primarily diverse (CST-IV; 63.5%), or Discussion: Sub-optimal menstrual materials were used commonly and associated with non-optimal VMB composition. Reusable menstrual discs that may be worn during sex may address the economic factors driving sub-optimal MM that are associated with non-optimal VMB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.