ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025
Clinical validation and utility of targeted nanopore sequencing for rapid pathogen diagnosis and precision therapy in lung cancer patients with pulmonary infections.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The lung microbiome in childhood-onset severe neuromuscular disease with respiratory insufficiency: rationale, current evidence, and opportunities for oxford nanopore long-read sequencing.Molecular and cellular pediatrics · 2026Review
- Harnessing next-generation microbial diagnostics to optimize infection management in immunocompromised hosts.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2026Review
- [Value of CD4+/CD8+ Ratio Combined with nCD64 Index in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid for Differential Diagnosis of Lung Cancer and Non-lung Cancer Diseases].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary infections are common in patients with lung cancer (LC), complicating diagnosis and treatment. This study explored the diagnostic performance and clinical utility of targeted nanopore sequencing (TNPseq) for detecting pathogens in LC-related pulmonary infections. Methods: A total of 143 patients with LC or benign pulmonary diseases complicated by pulmonary infections were included and stratified into diagnostic and therapeutic cohorts. Sputum samples underwent conventional culture, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), and TNPseq analyses. Microbiota profiles were compared across disease groups and correlated with tumor therapy responses. In the therapeutic cohort, clinical outcomes were assessed between empirical therapy and TNPseq-guided therapy. Results: TNPseq identified a significantly higher proportion of clinically relevant pathogens compared to mNGS (48.76% vs. 16.80%, p < 0.001) and demonstrated superior sensitivity (81.25% vs. 68.75%), with a 40.7% reduction in turnaround time (16 hours vs. 27 hours). Both sequencing methods revealed an enrichment of Conclusions: By enabling rapid pathogen detection and profiling of the pulmonary microbiome, TNPseq facilitates targeted therapy and reduces antibiotic overuse in LC patients. These findings highlight the potential of TNPseq as a promising, rapid, and non-invasive diagnostic candidate for first-line use, offering a comprehensive view of both infection and host-microbe interactions in immunocompromised patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.