ReviewFrontiers in public health2025
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Implementing Indicator Condition-Guided HIV Screening Alerts in the Emergency Department: Lessons Learned from a Case Study.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Failure to diagnose human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and late HIV diagnosis persist across Europe and Spain, sustained by missed diagnostic opportunities in routine care. Emergency departments (EDs), often the sole point of contact for vulnerable groups, are pivotal yet underused venues for early case finding. In response, the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES), with scientific sponsorship of the AIDS Study Group (GESIDA), published a consensus document recommending a targeted, opt-in HIV testing strategy in EDs triggered by specific HIV indicator conditions. This first consensus also emphasized standardized communication of results and linkage pathways to infectious disease care, and the use of electronic decision-support systems (preconfigured analytical panels and pop-up alerts) to normalize test ordering within ED workflows. An updated consensus later added further indicator conditions and recommended bundling hepatitis C virus (HCV) serology with every HIV test, supported by electronic health record (EHR)-based decision-support tools, clear linkage-to-care pathways and expanding the role of nursing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.