ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
The digital transformation of healthcare: a national cross-sectional study on usage, patterns, attitudes, and barriers across social groups in Israel.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Online health services (OHS) have emerged as a response to healthcare challenges, offering a way to enhance system efficiency. Despite their numerous advantages, studies reveal varying efficacies among populations with differing sociodemographic characteristics. In this study, we describe OHS usage and its characteristics, examine knowledge, attitudes, barriers, and usage patterns in different groups in Israel, and present a predictive model for OHS consumption. Methods: Using a random representative sample stratified by sex, ethnicity, age, and religious affiliation, a cross-sectional study was conducted in Jewish and Arab populations in Israel. Sampling was further stratified by ethnicity and geographical region. Data were collected via an online questionnaire administered through iPanel records. Results: The sample comprised 2001 participants with an average age of 47 years; about half were women. The research differentiated between low- and high-level technologies. Participants reported an absence of technological or emotional barriers and were more familiar with low-level technology and used it more frequently. The perceived efficacy of OHS was high, but some participants preferred face-to-face treatment. Predictors of familiarity with and use of high-level OHS included being male, Arab, insured by the Clalit HMO, and having high perceived health literacy, efficacy and safety. Conclusion: Online and face-to-face healthcare services are complementary, while high-level and low-level OHS are distinct categories providing services for different healthcare needs. Because technological barriers are almost absent, access to OHS can expand more easily. Policymakers should focus on improving digital health literacy, particularly in the use of high-level technologies, and map the needs of the older population to provide them with personalized services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.