ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Graduates feedback on the master of public health program in the United Arab Emirates: a mixed method study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The increasing complexity of public health challenges necessitates well-trained professionals equipped with a diverse range of competencies. The Master of Public Health (MPH) programs play a crucial role in preparing the workforce to address emerging health issues. This study evaluates the MPH program at the Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University (UAEU), to assess its impact on graduates' career progression, competency application, and areas for improvement. Methods: A mixed-methods approach was employed, using an online survey and in-depth interviews with MPH alumni. A structured questionnaire was distributed to 99 graduates, with a response rate of 25% ( Results: The median age of the participants was 38 years, about 80% of the respondents were female, and 88% were employed full-time. Overall, 52% rated the MPH program as excellent, and 64% reported that it met their expectations. However, only 32% experienced career progression, while 60% faced challenges in securing relevant job opportunities. Research engagement remained low, with only 8% publishing in peer-reviewed journals post-graduation. The participants also identified gaps in practical training, methodological instruction, and research opportunities, suggesting the need for a thesis track, structured internships, and expanded coursework in digital health, policy analysis, and leadership. Conclusion: While the MPH program at UAEU is well-regarded, improvements in curriculum design, practical training, and research support are necessary to enhance its impact on career advancement and public health practice. Addressing these gaps will better align the program with evolving workforce demands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.