ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
When the cure leaks: corruption, health spending, and health outcomes in Malawi.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The common assumption that higher investment leads to improved development outcomes is challenged in the health sector by widespread corruption practices-a paradox that fundamentally challenges the effectiveness of public health spending. The current paper sought to examine the impact of health spending on health outcomes and how this relationship changes under the auspices of increasing corruption trends in Malawi. Methods: The study employed the autoregressive distributed lag approach, bounds cointegration, and the error correction model to establish the long-run relationship among the variables for annual time series data from 1990 to 2023. Results: Empirical findings revealed that a one-unit increase in corruption reduces life expectancy by 0.146 percentage points and increases infant mortality by 0.0226 percentage points in the long run. In addition, while the long-run coefficient of health spending increases life expectancy and reduces under-five mortality, the contingent effect of corruption worsens the results by 0.317 and 0.149 percentage points, respectively. Conclusion: These results concur with our location of corruption within the institutional hypothesis-which posit that the quality and structure of institutions determine economic performance, and the Solow swan growth model in which we see corruption as an externality and source of inefficiencies, reducing the productivity of public investment in health (K) and the rate of technological progress (A(t)). Importantly, we made various policy suggestions, such as tying health expenditure to measurable outcomes to ensure efficiency and reduce leakages of public funds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.