Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41602007›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Does the targeted poverty alleviation program improve the subjective well-being of poor households? Empirical evidence from China.

Dazhe Wang, Xiaolei Yang

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dazhe WangSchool of Economics, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing, China.
Xiaolei YangSchool of Economics, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhancing the subjective well-being of poor households is crucial for the world's sustainable development. Using a comprehensive household-level dataset from the China Household Finance Survey (CHFS) spanning 2011 to 2019, this study employed a multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) approach to systematically identify the causal effect and underlying mechanisms of the Targeted Poverty Alleviation (TPA) program on the subjective well-being of poverty-stricken households. Then it explored the heterogeneous effects of different assistance measures on their subjective well-being. We found that the TPA program significantly improves the subjective well-being of rural poor households after a series of robustness checks. The analysis indicated that the TPA program improves the happiness of poor households by reducing their relative poverty and promoting their labor participation to eliminate poverty. We found that providing basic public services, means of agricultural production, and communication infrastructure all enhance the positive impact of TPA on happiness, while the housing relocation program, transportation infrastructure investment, and agricultural technical support do not. The conclusions of this study have important policy implications for ensuring equitable access to basic public services, consolidating the effective link between poverty alleviation achievements and rural revitalization in the post-poverty era, thereby promoting the common prosperity of rural households.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsPovertyChinaHappinessHumansPsychological Well-BeingRural PopulationSurveys and Questionnairesbasic public servicescommon prosperitydifference-in-differencesrelative povertysubjective well-beingtargeted poverty alleviation

Identifiers

PMID41602007
PMCPMC12833425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.