Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41601915›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2026

Improving medication error classification using a reasoning large language model.

Anders Krifors, Theodor Beskow, Magnus Jonsson, Karl-Johan Lindner, Jenny Calås, Veronica Arwsbo, Kristian Sandström, Christer Norström

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anders KriforsCentre for Clinical Research Västmanland, Uppsala University, Västerås Hospital, 721 89 Västerås, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1230-0492
Theodor BeskowNorrvy Intelligence AB, 117 59 Stockholm, Sweden.
Magnus JonssonNorrvy Intelligence AB, 117 59 Stockholm, Sweden.
Karl-Johan LindnerDepartment of Pharmacy, Region Västmanland, 721 89 Västerås, Västmanland County, Sweden.
Jenny CalåsDepartment of Pharmacy, Region Västmanland, 721 89 Västerås, Västmanland County, Sweden.
Veronica ArwsboDepartment of Pharmacy, Region Västmanland, 721 89 Västerås, Västmanland County, Sweden.
Kristian SandströmSchool of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Mälardalen University, 721 23 Västerås, Sweden.
Christer NorströmSchool of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Mälardalen University, 721 23 Västerås, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the performance of a reasoning large language model (LLM) in identifying medication errors in medical incident reports. Materials and Methods: OpenAI's O4-mini LLM was adapted using prompt engineering on 75 000 anonymized incident reports from the Västmanland region of Sweden (2019-2024). To guide the prompt design, we used a subset of 2434 reports, which were manually reclassified by pharmacists as medication-related or not. For validation, 200 reports (January 2024-March 2024) were independently classified by 2 pharmacists to establish a reference classification. Moreover, the LLM performed binary classification, with concordance rates measured against the expert consensus. Results: The LLM achieved a concordance rate of 96.0% (192/200; 95% CI, 92.3-98.3) with expert classification. Eight cases (4.0%) showed disagreements, primarily due to linguistic ambiguity or context-dependent interpretation. Five cases involved pharmacists classifying reports as non-medication-related, while the LLM classified them as medication-related, with the reverse in 3 cases. Subcategorization accuracy was 76.5%. Discussion: The LLM showed expert-level performance, outperforming existing automated methods. Thus, its integration into incident reporting systems might improve the efficiency, accuracy, and consistency of patient safety monitoring. Conclusion: This validated AI-driven method can be integrated directly into clinical informatics workflows, enabling healthcare organizations to rapidly and consistently identify medication errors, ultimately enhancing patient safety outcomes.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceincident reportingmedication errorsnatural language processingpatient safety

Identifiers

PMID41601915
PMCPMC12832951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.