Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41601892›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2025

Efficacy and safety of antioxidants and dietary therapies for epilepsy: an umbrella meta-analysis.

Yingqi Feng, Shanshan Cai, Mengyao Wang, Yujia Guo, Ziyu Zhou, Rutong Wang, Shen Yang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yingqi Feng *Department of Neurology, the First People's Hospital of Xiangtan City, Xiangtan, Hunan, China.
Shanshan Cai *Division of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
Mengyao WangClinical Anatomy and Reproductive Medicine Application Institute, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China.
Yujia GuoDepartment of Neurology, the First People's Hospital of Xiangtan City, Xiangtan, Hunan, China.
Ziyu ZhouClinical Anatomy and Reproductive Medicine Application Institute, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China.
Rutong WangDepartment of Neurology, the First People's Hospital of Xiangtan City, Xiangtan, Hunan, China.
Shen YangDepartment of Neurology, the First People's Hospital of Xiangtan City, Xiangtan, Hunan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Epilepsy is a prevalent chronic neurological disorder. A substantial proportion of patients develop drug-resistant epilepsy. Existing antiepileptic drugs are associated with adverse effects and demonstrate limited efficacy in refractory cases. Oxidative stress plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of epilepsy. Antioxidants such as vitamin D, vitamin E, and melatonin, as well as dietary therapies like the ketogenic diet, have garnered attention as potential adjunctive treatments. However, existing studies exhibit significant controversy and heterogeneity. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of antioxidants and dietary therapies in the treatment of epilepsy, and to provide evidence-based support for clinical decision-making. Methods: Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Eighteen eligible meta-analyses were selected for umbrella review based on predefined criteria. Pooled relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects or fixed-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I Results: Dietary therapies-particularly the Low Glycemic Index Treatment (LGIT)-significantly increased the likelihood of achieving ≥50% (RR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.58-2.33) and ≥90% (RR: 3.33; 95% CI: 1.51-5.14) seizure reduction. However, dietary therapies were ineffective in achieving seizure freedom (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.00-1.36). In subgroup analyses of ≥50% seizure reduction, antioxidants did not demonstrate significant efficacy. Both antioxidants and dietary therapies significantly increased the overall incidence of adverse events (RR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.19-1.92). Specifically, the ketogenic diet elevated the risks of dyslipidemia (RR: 3.56; 95% CI: 2.00-5.11), weight loss (RR: 4.80; 95% CI: 3.43-6.17), constipation (RR: 3.02; 95% CI: 1.55-4.48), and kidney stones (RR: 5.24; 95% CI: 3.73-6.74). Melatonin was ineffective in reducing seizure frequency (RR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.00-0.63). Considerable heterogeneity was observed across studies. Conclusion: Dietary therapies-notably LGIT-demonstrate clear efficacy in reducing seizure frequency but do not facilitate seizure freedom. Current evidence does not support the use of antioxidants as effective adjunctive therapy for epilepsy. These interventions, particularly the ketogenic diet, are associated with increased risks of adverse effects, necessitating careful benefit-risk assessment in clinical application. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251166437, identifier: CRD420251166437.

Indexed as

antioxidantsdrug-resistant epilepsyepilepsyketogenic dietumbrella meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID41601892
PMCPMC12832287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.