ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Padding interpolation, median imputation, RobustScalar, and particle swarm optimization with heterogeneous classifiers: a robust combination for effective heart disease diagnosis.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Dynamic alignment of large language models for evidence-grounded heart failure decision support.Digital healthArticle
- Accelerating the performance of machine learning classifiers using bacterial colony optimization for heart disease prediction.Digital healthArticle
- Enhancing clinical reliability in pressure injury prediction: A conformal prediction approach with machine learning models.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Heart disease is a leading cause of death worldwide, necessitating accurate early diagnosis. Although machine learning (ML) shows potential for this task, many current models are hindered by data inconsistencies, poor feature selection, and limited robustness. Methods: This study proposes a novel, robust diagnostic framework. It employs advanced data preprocessing using Padding Interpolation for missing values, Median Imputation for outliers, and RobustScalar for scaling to ensure data integrity. A key innovation is an Improved Particle Swarm Optimization (IPSO) algorithm, enhanced with dynamic inertia weight and a mutation operator to avoid premature convergence. This IPSO performs dual optimization: selecting optimal features and tuning the hyperparameters of five classifiers (Logistic Regression, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Gaussian Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Classifier, and XGBoost). Results: The framework was evaluated on a composite dataset from five public repositories. The proposed IPSO-optimized XGBoost model achieved superior performance at a 90:10 train-test split, with an accuracy of 91.3%, sensitivity of 88.37%, specificity of 93.88%, precision of 92.68%, F1-score of 90.48%, and a Diagnostic Odds Ratio of 116.53. Statistical tests (p < 0.05) confirmed these improvements over baselines were significant. The model also demonstrated consistent generalizability on independent Cleveland and Statlog datasets. Discussion: The results establish that the integrated framework of rigorous preprocessing and the hybrid IPSO optimization-classification model creates a highly effective and generalizable pipeline for automated heart disease diagnosis, addressing key limitations of existing approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.