ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
A diagnostic scoring system for differentiating between benign and malignant cystic ovarian tumors, utilizing imaging features and biomarkers.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Our study aims to establish and validate a diagnostic scoring system for distinguishing malignant cystic ovarian tumors (MCOTs) from benign cystic ovarian tumors (BCOTs). Methods: The study population was sourced from two independent hospitals. The subjects included 159 patients with 196 masses (137 in the training cohort and 59 in the validation cohort) who had undergone MRI or CT examinations with pathologically confirmed BCOT or MCOT. Four clinical characteristics, four biomarkers, and 16 imaging features were collected. Univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent predictors for differentiating MCOTs from BCOTs. The independent predictors were weighted based on regression coefficients to construct a scoring system. The overall score distribution was categorized into three groups to illustrate the diagnostic probability of MCOTs. Results: The scoring system consisted of four independent predictive factors, including CA125, and three imaging features: texture, septum thickness, and enhancement degree. The area under the curve (AUC) for the scoring system was 0.956 (95% CI 0.926-0.986; Conclusion: The established scoring system is reliable and convenient for distinguishing between MCOTs and BCOTs by utilizing elevated CA125 levels, cystic-solid components, septum thickness≥4 mm, and a moderate or prominent degree of enhancement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.