Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41601764›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

4D-CT strain analysis for biomechanical characterization of COPD in patients undergoing radiotherapy planning: an exploratory study.

Qi Dai, Xiaoxiao Zhu, Hai Chen, Xun Wang, Bin Chen, Jingyun Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qi DaiSchool of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoxiao ZhuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Hai ChenDepartment of Radiology, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Xun WangDepartment of Radiation Technology, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Bin ChenDepartment of Radiology, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Jingyun ShiSchool of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by progressive airflow limitation and altered pulmonary biomechanics. While conventional spirometry provides global functional information, it cannot assess regional heterogeneity. This exploratory study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) strain analysis in differentiating normal lung function from COPD in a cohort of patients with small pulmonary lesions who underwent 4D-CT as part of radiotherapy planning, thereby establishing feasibility for potential future integration into treatment workflows. Methods: This single-center retrospective cross-sectional study included 46 patients with pulmonary lesions ≤ 3 cm who underwent 4D-CT localization scanning for radiotherapy planning between January 2021 and March 2024. Patients were stratified into normal lung function ( Results: Despite the small COPD sample size ( Conclusion: This exploratory study provides preliminary evidence that 4D-CT strain analysis, particularly Speedmax, shows promise for differentiating normal lung function from COPD in patients with small pulmonary lesions. However, given the small sample size and single-center design, diagnostic performance metrics should be interpreted with caution. External validation in larger, multi-center cohorts is required before clinical implementation.

Indexed as

4D-CTchronic obstructive pulmonary diseasefunctional imagingpulmonary biomechanicsradiotherapy planningstrain analysis

Identifiers

PMID41601764
PMCPMC12832535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.