ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
A refined diagnostic approach for interstitial lung disease: efficient and safe transbronchial cryobiopsy using a 1.1-mm cryoprobe.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transbronchial Lung Cryobiopsy and Awake Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery in Interstitial Lung Disease: Complementary Roles in a Stepwise Diagnostic Approach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advancing Transbronchial Lung Cryobiopsy in Interstitial Lung Disease with Adjunctive Tools and Smaller Cryoprobes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Diagnostic yield and complication rate of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy using 1.1 mm probe in patients with interstitial lung disease.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) has emerged as a less invasive alternative to surgical biopsy for diagnosing interstitial lung disease (ILD). However, data on the performance of thinner cryoprobes remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility, safety and pathological spectrum of TBLC using a 1.1-mm cryoprobe in a real-world cohort. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 52 patients with ILD who underwent TBLC with a 1.1-mm cryoprobe from July 2023 to July 2025. Procedures were performed under digital subtraction angiography guidance using a standardized protocol. Primary outcomes were diagnostic yield and pathological spectrum; secondary outcomes included specimen characteristics and procedure-related complications. Results: The study demonstrated a high diagnostic yield of 88.5%. Multidisciplinary discussion diagnosis (MDD) revealed a diverse diagnostic spectrum: known-etiology ILD (50%) with hypersensitivity pneumonitis being the most common; idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (19.2%), mainly nonspecific interstitial pneumonia; and rare ILD (19.2%) with pulmonary alveolar proteinosis being the most common. The mean number of specimens obtained per operation was 3.5 ± 1.2, with a median specimen diameter of 5 mm (IQR: 4-6). The rate of severe bleeding was low at 3.8%, and there was no extremely severe bleeding. Pneumothorax occurred in only 1.9% of cases and managed without chest tube drainage. Conclusion: TBLC with the 1.1-mm cryoprobe is a highly informative and safe diagnostic method for ILD. It obtains high-quality samples that enable accurate classification, particularly in challenging cases, supporting its key role in minimally invasive diagnosis and precision in pathological subtyping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.