ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Classification of angioedema types using decision tree modeling.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: All angioedema (AE) presents with transient, localized swelling; however, the underlying causes, prognosis, and treatments vary significantly. Consequently, identifying a specific AE type is challenging. Methods: We aimed to apply a machine learning (ML) model to improve AE diagnosis. Random forest (RF) ML was used to create a prediction model for diagnosing correct AE types. Development comprised a literature search to establish AE's clinical characteristics, developing and translating questions in collaboration with 12 European AE centers, and selecting, testing, validating and optimizing the established ML model. Analysis included 342 specialist-diagnosed patients with one of six AE types. Results: The final optimized RF model correctly identified AE types with true positive rates of up to 94% in hereditary AE due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (C1INH), with a Percentage Accuracy of 89·2% and a Kappa value of 81·8% across the six AE types, with a high agreement with the diagnoses made by experts. Discussion: This is the first ever reported ML algorithm designed to pre-assess to aid AE diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.