ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025
Identification and validation of an interpretable EEG-based machine learning model for the diagnosis of post-stroke cognitive impairment.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Advances in research on neuroelectrophysiological characteristics of post-stroke cognitive impairment based on quantitative electroencephalography and acupuncture interventions].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is a prevalent and disabling consequence of stroke, yet objective tools for its early identification are lacking. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model based on electroencephalography (EEG) to support the early detection of PSCI. Methods: We conducted a study involving 174 participants, including stroke patients with and without cognitive impairment and age-matched healthy controls. Resting-state EEG was acquired from all subjects, and multidimensional features, including power spectral ratios and microstate parameters, were extracted. Feature selection was performed using LASSO regression, random forest, and the Boruta algorithm. Five machine learning models were evaluated and compared based on their area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, Brier score, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. Model interpretability was explained using SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations). The final validated model was deployed as an interactive web-based application. Results: Seven EEG features were identified as most predictive of PSCI: the delta-plus-theta to alpha-plus-beta ratio (DTABR) in frontal, central, and global regions; the mean microstate duration of classes A and B (A-MMD, B-MMD); the mean frequency of microstate D (D-MFO); and the mean coverage of microstate A (A-MC). The random forest model demonstrated the highest performance (AUC = 0.91, accuracy = 0.83, specificity = 0.88, Brier score = 0.12), alongside satisfactory calibration and a positive net clinical benefit. The model was further validated on an independent external cohort ( Discussion: The findings suggest that an interpretable EEG-based ML model can provide accurate early screening of PSCI. Integration of this approach into clinical workflows may support personalized rehabilitation strategies and optimize post-stroke care. Future studies are warranted to validate the model in larger, multicenter cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.