Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41601591›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025

Beyond the auditory system: cognitive implications of age-related hearing loss.

Fabiola Paciello, Anna Pisani, Anna Rita Fetoni, Claudio Grassi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fabiola PacielloDepartment of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Anna PisaniDepartment of Neuroscience, Unit of Audiology, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Anna Rita FetoniDepartment of Neuroscience, Unit of Audiology, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Claudio GrassiDepartment of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age-related hearing loss (ARHL) is one of the most common causes of disability in older adults. It is also frequently associated with neurological and neurodegenerative disorders, including dementia, as well as with stress, anxiety, depression, and social isolation. These observations suggest that ARHL should be considered not merely as a sensory dysfunction, but rather as a complex disease involving extra-auditory domains. Namely, identifying shared pathogenic determinants between hearing loss and neurodegenerative diseases remains a significant challenge. Increasing research in this field has highlighted common molecular mechanisms underlying age-related hearing and cognitive vulnerability, as well as potential overlapping neuronal networks involved in both cognitive and auditory neurodegeneration. In this review, we first outline the clinical features, risk factors, and molecular pathways involved in ARHL. We then examine the molecular mechanisms underlying ARHL at both peripheral (cochlea) and central level (auditory cortex), and subsequently discuss the cognitive comorbidities of ARHL, with a particular focus on cognitive impairment and affective disorders. From a translational point of view, exploring the extra-auditory consequences of ARHL will be crucial, as it will enable the identification of risk factors for both auditory and cognitive vulnerability and support the development of effective therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

ageingauditory systemcognitive declinehearing lossmood disorders

Identifiers

PMID41601591
PMCPMC12833227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.