ArticleIBRO neuroscience reports2025
Evaluation of reserpine-induced fibromyalgia in mice: A comparative behavioral, neurochemical, and histological assessment of two doses.
Article in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuroscience in Asia-Pacific : Horizons and Innovations.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Honokiol ameliorates reserpine-induced fibromyalgia through antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, neurotrophic, and anti-apoptotic mechanisms.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic pain disorder characterised by widespread musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, and cognitive disturbances. Due to its complex and poorly understood pathophysiology, reliable animal models are essential for research. Reserpine is commonly used to induce FM in animals, effectively replicating key symptoms such as widespread pain, hypersensitivity, and mood disturbances. However, the varying doses used in studies and the often unclear rationale for dose selection have led to a lack of standardisation for this model. In this study, we investigated the effects of commonly used reserpine doses (0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg) to induce FM in mice. Following three consecutive days of subcutaneous reserpine injections, we conducted detailed behavioural assessments and microscopic examinations of tissue changes. We also compared the effects of the two reserpine doses on serotonin, norepinephrine, glutamate, interleukin (IL)-1β, and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α levels in the brain and spinal cord. The behavioural assessment demonstrated that both doses of reserpine had nearly the same effect relatively early after administration. Histological examination revealed neurotoxic effects of reserpine, particularly in the hippocampus and thalamus, which was more obvious at day 11 with the 0.5 mg/kg dose. Furthermore, this dose significantly altered all neurotransmitter levels compared with the control group. While the effect of the 0.25 mg/kg dose on neurotransmitter levels was limited, it altered the IL-1β and TNF-α levels in the brain and spinal cord. Our findings indicate that injecting reserpine at 0.25 or 0.5 mg/kg for three consecutive days is effective in inducing FM-like pain in mice, characterised by mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity, along with associated depression and motor deficits. However, the 0.5 mg/kg dose is optimal for inducing persistent neurochemical alterations and histopathological changes, lasting up to 10 days following the initial injection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.