ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
A qualitative exploration of mental health first aid training in underserved communities facing repeated extreme weather events.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Successive extreme weather events, including hurricanes and floods, have been reported to negatively impact mental health. Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) training is an evidence-based approach to improve participants' knowledge, attitudes, and confidence in recognizing, approaching, and supporting individuals experiencing mental health challenges. Investigations have supported its perceived acceptability and utility within professional and health-care populations; however, the appropriateness and applicability of this training in underserved populations in disaster-prone areas are unknown. Methods: Eligible participants self-described as residing in disaster-prone areas and participated in MHFA training between February and September, 2025 in Houston, Texas. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted to assess perceptions of the appropriateness and utility of the MHFA training for disaster preparedness, how participants perceived mental health, and access to available resources 6-8 weeks after the MHFA training completion. Mental health support measures were used to assess the support that participants self-reported they provided to others after completing the MHFA training. Results: Most participants (63.6%) reported knowing someone who experienced a mental health problem in the past year. Supportive behaviors were common, with over 85% reporting evidence-based responses (e.g., asking about self-harm, active listening, conveying hope, and offering resources). Reflexive thematic analysis resulted in three primary themes: (1) awareness and impact of mental health struggles and the role of the community; (2) understanding the realities of mental healthcare resource access and necessary steps to increase uptake; and (3) community residents indicated the MHFA training was useful and appropriate for disaster preparedness. The findings highlight the usefulness of MHFA trainings in underserved communities that are affected by successive disasters. Implications: The results suggest that MHFA training meaningfully improved participants' recognition of mental health challenges, confidence in offering support, and awareness of available resources, even within communities facing repeated disaster exposure. These findings also indicate that MHFA may strengthen community capacity for the early identification and response to mental health needs by equipping residents with practical skills that they actively apply in real-world situations following the training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.