ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Unveiling heterogeneous gaze patterns in autistic children undergoing rTMS: insights from latent profile analysis.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a promising intervention for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), but objective markers for rTMS tolerance remain lacking. This case-control study explored gaze behavior variability toward emotional faces in ASD children undergoing rTMS, focusing on identifying subgroups associated with rTMS intolerance. Method: Eye-tracking data (Tobii technology, preferential-looking paradigm) were collected from 104 ASD children (48 intolerant, 56 tolerant) receiving DLPFC-targeted rTMS (left high-frequency, right low-frequency). Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) identified fixation subgroups across eight conditions. Demographic (sex, age), clinical (CARS scores) differences, and profile-tolerance associations were analyzed. Results: LPA revealed three gaze profiles: moderate non-preferential fixation (80.76%), low diverse fixation (9.62%), and increased fixation with mild variability (9.62%). Sex and CARS scores differed across profiles (age did not). Intolerance rates were 38.1%, 60.0%, and 100%, with profiles predicting rTMS intolerance (OR = 0.210, 95% CI: 0.079-0.557). Conclusion: ASD children exhibit heterogeneous emotional face gaze patterns. Findings highlight the need for personalized rTMS interventions, especially for those with higher CARS scores and increased emotional face fixation-at elevated intolerance risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.