ArticleClinical endocrinology2026
ACTH Stimulation Testing Is Often Unnecessary After Appropriate Patient Preparation Prior to Screening Cortisol Measurement.
Article in Clinical endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextScreening morning serum cortisol is used to select patients for ACTH stimulation testing to diagnose adrenal insufficiency (AI) but may be affected by pre-analytical factors. Careful consideration to discontinue confounding medications beforehand may preclude the need for subsequent stimulation testing.
objectiveTo determine whether serum cortisol collected after discontinuation of confounding medications is more predictive of AI compared to screening morning cortisol without mandatory medication adjustment.
methodsRetrospective chart review of 835 patients with ACTH stimulation testing (Short Synacthen Test [SST]). Linear regression to compare Roche Cortisol II immunoassay screening cortisol versus optimally collected cortisol measurements after removal of confounding medications. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses to identify 100% sensitivity threshold for AI.
resultsThe majority of patients passed the SST (n = 756; 90.5%). There was a poor correlation between screening morning cortisol and optimally collected cortisol measurements, r = 0.34 (95% CI, 0.25-0.42). Real-world screening morning cortisol measurements had moderate discrimination for the diagnosis of AI (AUC 0.80; 95% CI, 0.77-0.82; p < 0.001) with a 100% sensitivity threshold for AI of 262 nmol/L. Applying this threshold would save 112 SSTs (13.4% of all tests). In contrast, an optimally collected serum cortisol had strong discrimination for AI (AUC 0.89; 95% CI, 0.87-0.91; p < 0.0001) and the threshold with 100% sensitivity for the diagnosis was 246 nmol/L which would save another 4.8% of all tests.
conclusionCareful attention to pre-test patient preparation and implementation of a lower cortisol threshold may significantly reduce the number of stimulation tests needed to screen for AI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.