Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41601356›Full record

ArticleJournal of the science of food and agriculture2026

Definition of a sensory lexicon and development of sensory wheels of eighteen monovarietal Italian white wines.

Paola Piombino, Elisabetta Pittari, Roberto Salvatore Di Fede, Maria Tiziana Lisanti, Silvia Carlin, Andrea Curioni, Giovanni Luzzini, Christine Mayr Marangon, Matteo Marangon, Fulvio Mattivi and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Paola PiombinoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Division of Vine and Wine Sciences, University of Napoli Federico II, Avellino (AV), Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8705-9846
Elisabetta PittariDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Division of Vine and Wine Sciences, University of Napoli Federico II, Avellino (AV), Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6929-951X
Roberto Salvatore Di FedeDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Division of Vine and Wine Sciences, University of Napoli Federico II, Avellino (AV), Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0866-1573
Maria Tiziana LisantiDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Division of Vine and Wine Sciences, University of Napoli Federico II, Avellino (AV), Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8553-1369
Silvia CarlinCenter Research and Innovation, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige (TN), Italy.
Andrea CurioniDepartment of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Legnaro (PD), Italy.
Giovanni LuzziniDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, San Pietro in Cariano (VR), Italy.
Christine Mayr MarangonDepartment of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Legnaro (PD), Italy.
Matteo MarangonDepartment of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Legnaro (PD), Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5358-2428
Fulvio MattiviCenter Research and Innovation, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige (TN), Italy.
Maria Alessandra PaissoniDepartment of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Torino, Grugliasco (TO), Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2160-8632
Giuseppina Paola ParpinelloDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Cesena (FC), Italy.
Maurizio PiergiovanniCentre Agriculture Food Environment (C3A), University of Trento, San Michele all'Adige (TN), Italy.
Arianna RicciDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Cesena (FC), Italy.
Susana Río SegadeDepartment of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Torino, Grugliasco (TO), Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9617-0017
Luca RolleDepartment of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Torino, Grugliasco (TO), Italy.
Maurizio UglianoDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, San Pietro in Cariano (VR), Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6487-2866
Luigi MoioDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Division of Vine and Wine Sciences, University of Napoli Federico II, Avellino (AV), Italy.

Funding

Ministry of Education, University and Research under the PRIN 2017 grant (Prot. 2017RXFFRR)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundItaly harbors one of the richest grapevine biodiversities worldwide, yet the sensory identity of wines from many native cultivars remains poorly defined despite their relevance on the market at regional, national, or international levels. This study provides a systematic sensory characterization of 18 Italian monovarietal white wines, analyzed across 246 commercial samples, including wines never investigated before by sensory analysis. Analysis of variance, hierarchical cluster analysis, and principal component analysis were applied to Rate-All-That-Apply (RATA) data performed by trained panelists to define a lexicon and identify the sensory attributes characterizing and discriminating the 18 wine types.

resultsA statistically based lexicon comprising 29 olfactory and seven taste/mouthfeel descriptors was defined. Multivariate statistics showed that the 18 monovarietal wine types belong to four main olfactory dimensions, labeled as fruity-balsamic, thiolic-mineral, floral-sweet, and toasty-dried. A three-dimensional space was defined along the four olfactory directions. Müller Thurgau, Gewürztraminer, Albana, and Falanghina emerged as the most representative wines in these directions, outlining the vertices of a spatial framework within and around which the other wines are distributed. Sensory wheels representing structured visual synthesis of the most relevant attributes (odor, taste, mouthfeel) were developed as 'identity models', providing systematic tools for defining wines' varietal typicality.

conclusionResults are relevant for enologists and wine sellers as standardized reference sensory models for production and communication, as benchmarks for PDO/PGI quality control and disciplinary improvement, for researchers to advance modeling of wine sensory quality through sensometabolomic wine studies. Results also support the international recognition and valorization of Italian grapevine biodiversity according to Agenda 2030 sustainable development goals. © 2026 The Author(s). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Indexed as

WineHumansItalyOdorantsSmellTasteVitisaromadescriptive sensory profilesflavor vocabularymodel wheelsmouthfeeltaste

Identifiers

PMID41601356
PMCPMC12988708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.